I want the whole world to know how much I love having my Hanes on. I have released all photos and videos of myself wearing, male-modeling or reviewing ladies panties into the public domain. PLEASE SHARE, DISPLAY AND PUBLISH THEM EVERYWHERE!
Even a cursory glance confirms that these are, in fact women’s underpants. Their beautiful rich design, full coverage and opacity, makes these panties an excellent choice for wearing out in public in keeping with the increasingly in vogue underwear as outerwear trend. These full briefs seem to me to be begging to be seen.
The photos and video above have been released into the public domain. Please share them.
“This full brief by Vanity Fair is once again your favorite. Made of 100% nylon for a silky soft feel, this panty provides full coverage. It’s offered in many different colors so everyone can have the color they love. The panty has an ultra-soft covered elastic waistband and covered elastic leg openings for a comfortable, custom fit. Comes in sizes 5 to 12 (Small to 5X)”
Transcript: Transform your intimate apparel wardrobe with the Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Tailored Brief. This beautiful best selling style is a classic, with its double stitched waistband and comfortable no-ride elastic leg openings.Tailored from soft one hundred percent nylon fabric, this panty provides full coverage comfort to make it the perfect complement for any style of clothing. Available in an extended size for curvy figures. Experience Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Tailored Brief.
Transcript: Add a little feminine flair to your intimate apparel wardrobe with the Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Brief. The beautiful lace insets offer a delicate appeal, while the elastic waistband and leg trim give you a flexible and comfortable fit. This silhouette promises full coverage in both the front and back. Satiny nylon fabric keeps you comfortable throughout the day. Discover the elegant sophistication of Vanity Fair’s Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Brief.
As I watched these videos it I couldn’t help but continue to feel miffed that some of the customer lingerie review videos that featured me modeling the identical brand and style of Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Briefs had been marked with a warning: “This video may contain material flagged by YouTube’s user community that may be inappropriate for some users” and requiring people to sign in (and have a Google account?) in order to view them. One poorly lighted video of me modeling and reviewing these same briefs had disappeared and in it’s place was posted a false claim saying “This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy on nudity or sexual content” (slandering me). I consider that it was a clear-cut case of sex discrimination and that the real objection was to my being a MAN SEEN WEARING LADIES PANTIES!
An embed of one of my earlier videos:
The pair of Memoir Rose Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Style 13001 ladies full brief nylon panties shown here male modeled, back view, are available both in a wide variety of lingerie and department stores online and in - store. This particular style of Vanity Fair ladies nylon full brief panties are made of a silky-soft finely woven nylon tricot with a cotton lined gusset and triangular lace insets. Vanity Fair advertises these panties as being both comfortable to wear and pretty to look at. I love the colour, look and feel of these panties and wish I could find more of them in a similar vibrant ultra-feminine pink colour. This video is released into the public domain. Please share it.
As always, I love having the photos and videos of myself male-modeling and reviewing women’s underwear shared and republished as much as possible so please don’t hesitate to do so.
YouTube has severe problems with rampant false flagging of videos and they don’t have enough unprejudiced humans in their employ to review and unflag all the unjustly restricted videos. Innumerable videos are getting false flagged as “inappropriate” based on politics, theology and personal taste by prudes and bigots who have found false flagging to be an effective tool for suppressing expression which doesn’t conform to their own narrow-minded agendas.
Months ago two of my videos were false flagged and YouTube started to require viewers to log in in order to view the videos which were wrongfully put on restricted status.
Two of the auto-generated statements made by YouTube with respect to two of my videos are blatantly false.
Those two false statements are:
1) “This content may contain material flagged by YouTube’s user community that may be inappropriate for some users.”
2) “potentially inappropriate content,”
Contemporaneously, images of me male modeling ladies full brief panties, back view, stopped showing up on image searches.
Although YouTube’s lawyers may have been trying to cover themselves against libel claims by using the words “may” and “potentially”, the statements are still false and indisputably constitute sex discrimination.
Google’s YouTube may CONSIDER THIS AN APPEAL and request to have an UNPREJUDICED human restore both videos to unrestricted status.
One need only to view the YouTube videos by Victoria’s Secret, the YouTube No Pants Subway Ride 2011 by Improv Everywhere, and the numerous other videos of women in their ladies panties on YouTube to see that placing the two videos of me male modeling pink nylon panties on “Restricted” status is a blatant act of sex discrimination.
The falsely flagged videos in question of me (a man in panties) are embedded below:
Transcript: “The ladies full brief nylon panties that I’m wearing right now are Vanity Fair’s Memoir Rose Style 13001 Lace Nouveau full brief nylon panties. I love these panties and the color especially, which I wish that they still made. Um, as you can see, the gusset has a straight across rear seam, unlike the classic vintage Vanity Fair Style 13001 briefs which were manufactured years ago. These are my favorite panties.”
Transcript: “I guess you can see why so many women call me Panty Buns. Um, I’m male modeling a pair of Vanity Fair full brief nylon panties. They’re Lace Nouveau Style 13001 in Memoir Rose. I love being seen male-modeling ladies panties as a world famous male panty model. So you can just share it with every adult woman you know, um, and let me know what you think. You can let me know what you think at http://www.full-brief-panties-male-modeled.blogspot.com“
What is really peculiar is the difference between Google’s publicly stated goals of freedom of expression and in opposition to censorship and their current flagging system on YouTube and Google Image Search.
The United Nations has on it’s website “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, which the U.N. adopted on December 10, 1948. Google has pointed out that recent censorship attempts sought to violate Article 19 of that document and quotes it as saying: “Everyone has a right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
Despite having decried this kind of censorship, Google’s YouTube Community aids and abets censorship when it comes to the false flagging of YouTube videos. Google’s flagging system allows a minority of extremist prudes to effectively censor whatever they don’t like. Those who have their photos and videos false-flagged have no adequate recourse. Ergo, Google’s own policy enabling the false-flagging of videos as “potentially inappropriate” violates the very rights they claimed to support when they cited Article 19 of the United Nations “Declaration of Human Rights”.
As of this date YouTube continues to have an unmanageable problem with political operatives and bigots false-flagging every video they don’t like and not enough unprejudiced reviewers to correct all the false flagging. When free expression and due process are increasingly subordinated to systematic attacks by a group of ideologues and there is inadequate capacity (not enough unprejudiced human reviewers) for appeals and redress, then perhaps Google and YouTube should consider eliminating the entire system of flagging. It appears the system only works for those who like to false-flag.
the content on this site constitutes free speech and expression protected under the Ninth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments to the of the United States. This site is not commercial, is not a business, does not sell any service or product or anything at all, does not receive or solicit any compensation.
ALL PHOTOS AND VIDEOS OF ME MALE MODELING LADIES FULL BRIEF PANTIES ARE FREE AND ARE RELEASED INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN for any and all purposes with the sole exception that any attempts to restrict the rights of others to publish and share them shall be null and void.
Net neutrality demands that dominant internet presence may not be used to stifle or censor unpopular views, images and videos. These photos and videos are to remain forever in the public domain. For YouTube to require the public to acquire a YouTube channel and log into it in order to view any of my videos violates net neutrality and infringes on the rights of the public to peruse that which is in the public domain. Additionally to the false-flagged status is an example of market dominance being abused to restrict access to public domain material in furtherance of sex discrimination. Part of the purpose of the First Amendment is to protect unpopular expression and insure that it can be seen and heard. It would be nice to think that large corporate media owners might reconsider their opposition to having a free press.
Tags: #false flagging, #full briefs, #man in panties, #sex discrimination, #weird news, #funny, #viral video, #share this #violations of net neutrality
Since so few people are taking note of the Comment Policy I am presenting it again as a main page post.
Simply comment on the topic of the post and don’t include links to illegal stuff. How hard is that?
Comments on this website are moderated. If you have made a legitimate comment and it has not yet been posted, THANK YOU for your comment! Please be patient as it sometimes takes me a while to get to them. Please do not SPAM. Unfortunately I often have to delete more than 150 spam comments per day. I love getting genuine non-spam comments, even nasty ones. To increase your chances of getting your comment posted please note:
Legitimate comments get great latitude since censorship is deplored here. Offensive and derogatory comments do get published including colorful language.
Promotion of illegal stuff is not allowed unless, in the sole discretion of the administrator it is Constitutionally protected free expression and the laws are unconstitutional.
The same goes for links. Please do not submit URLs for illegal activity.
SPAM gets deleted. If your comment does not have some relation to the post under which it was submitted it will be deleted. Some self-promotion is okay, but comments with little or no content and tons of links and html are more likely to be deleted.
Generic comments are spam. Generic comments and comments unrelated to the posts will be deleted and/or marked as spam.
I reserve the right, as administrator, to edit SPAM and fuck around with it or add editorial comments to any pro-censorship political hackery. With that said,
This is a free speech site and chances are your non-spam comments will be published. Good commenters are more likely to get links. Thank you for your patience.
By entering this site and or viewing and or downloading this material you agree to bear full responsibility for determining if this material is in conformity with applicable laws for your locale. You agree to hold the persons and or things involved in creating or hosting this site harmless against any and all claims or actions resulting from your viewing, visiting, use or downloading anything from or on this site, indemnify them against any liability resulting therefrom, and will not distribute it to minors. You recognize that the content on this site constitutes free speech and expression protected under the Ninth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. This site is not commercial, is not a business, does not sell any service or product or anything at all, does not receive or solicit any compensation. All PHOTOS OF ME IN MY LADIES PANTIES (male modeled, back view) and any related text are FREE and have been released into the public domain. Please copy, share, re-post, and re-publish them for adult women everywhere. The rights to some Halloweens-in-full-drag-photos and some non-panty related text are reserved but may be used under the creative commons thing-a-ma-bob (fair use). Permissions with respect to any products such as MAKEUP or BOOKS etc. reside with their respective authors. All endorsements, recommendations and links are supplied for informational, educational, editorial, free expression and or entertainment purposes. Please share this site’s URL, feel free to make non-spam comments, and see if you can figure out how to make me world famous in my nylon women’s undies-modeled-back_view! Have you heard the expression be careful what you ask for? Well I’m begging for it and taunting you. I beg and dare you to make me world famous in my ladies panties complete with relentless saturation media coverage. Do you think you are smart enough to make it happen? Are you too chicken to do it? I’m double daring you!
I encourage all women to check out the photos of me, Panty Buns, male-modeling women’s underwear (full-briefs back-view) and to leave comments, questions and suggestions.
How much gender-bias do you think there is with respect to attitudes about a male-modeling ladies panties in comparison to when women model underwear? Had you ever heard of or known about a man wearing ladies panties before?
Photo of man modeling Dixie Belle lace trimmed full brief nylon panties, back view
Have you seen men wearing panties before? What were your thoughts? Please check out some of the photos of me, Panty Buns, modeling women’s underwear (full-briefs back-view) which are all released into the public domain. What do you think of me male-modeling ladies panties? If you’ve checked the “panty photos” out, I’d love to read your thoughts, comments, suggestions and questions (adult women only, please).
Photo of me male modeling Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau style 13001 Azure Mist nylon full brief panties, back view:
What qualities do you look for in full brief women’s underwear? The comfort of the particular full-brief ladies nylon panties? The fit of full-brief women’s-nylon-underpants? The sexiness of a sheer-nylon-panty? if there is lace trim in or on the ladies-briefs, whether it is inset or not? The stitching of the seams of the women’s briefs? The pattern and cut and size of the gusset of the women’s-undies? The feel of the nylon or silk fabric of the ladies-panty? Out of the following brands, which do you prefer? Dixie_Belle, Maidenform, Vanity Fair, Nancy King, WinterSilks, LandsEnd, other? Would you consider making comments about the qualities you see or like about each of these pairs brands and styles pictured in the free photos of various pairs of ladies panties male modeled, back view on this site at http://www.sissypantybuns.com/wordpress/?page_id=56 or being male-modeled in the videos uploaded to YouTube on Mister Panty Bun’s Channel?
Male Models Vanity Fair Rose Pink Full Brief Panties - YouTube
due to the constant requests I decided to post thumbnail sized panty-photos here in the panties-modeled-back_view category instead of just on the page at http://www.sissypantybuns,com/wordpress/?page_id=56 starting with just a couple and adding the rest in later. Since the posts seem to be a little independent of each other I’m sorry for having to bore you with the disclaimer again: DISCLAIMER - intended for Adult Women - (no minors or males, please) By entering this site and or viewing and or downloading this material you verify that you are over the age of 18 and bear full responsibility for determining if this material is in conformity with applicable laws for your locale. You agree to hold the persons and or things involved in creating or hosting this site harmless against any and all claims or actions resulting from your viewing, visiting, use or downloading anything from or on this site, indemnify them against any liability resulting therefrom. You recognize that the content on this site constitutes free speech and expression protected under the Ninth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. This site is not commercial, is not a business, does not sell any service or product or anything at all, does not receive or solicit any compensation. Any PHOTOS OF PANTIES-MODELED and accompanying text ARE FREE and have all been RELEASED into the public domain intended for viewing by mature ADULT WOMEN (all others please view somewhere else). All endorsements, recommendations and links are supplied for informational, educational, editorial, free expression and or entertainment purposes without compensation or any desire for it. Feel free to comment and share this site URL, your comments and see if you can figure out how to make me world famous in my nylon women’s undies-modeled-back_view! Have you heard the expression be careful what you ask for? Well I’m begging for it and taunting you: I dare you help make me world famous in my panties complete with relentless saturation media coverage. Maybe you’re not smart enough or too chicken to do it? Double dare! Here are some thumbnail size panty-photos. Some can be clicked on to enlarge. I, Panty Buns, am pleading to adult women: I beg you and dare you to share these with other consenting adult women everywhere.
Panty-photos of Panty Buns wearing an a.n.a. Peplum Electric Pink tie-front crepe-puff_sleeve blouse with Azure_Mist-style_13001 Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau lace inset full-brief-ladies-nylon-panties-modeled-back_view
free-panty-photos Panty-Buns in a Spencer_Jeremy-yellow-floral-pleated-neck-flutter-sleeve-crepe-blouse and Vanity_Fair-Perfectly_Yours-Lace_Nouveau black-nylon-full_brief-ladies-panties-modeled-back_view
All the photos are free of any copyright restrictions and are authorized to be published copied and shared. MODEL RELEASE AND DARE:
I, Panty Buns, also known as Mister Panty, hereby irrevocably RELEASE ALL THE PANTY PHOTOS of myself in my full brief ladies panties modeled back view to be copied, shared, re-published and viewed by and for all adult women on the planet. I further declare and confirm that all of these free panty photos and videos of myself posted at or as attachments to the web-pages having PANTY PHOTOS of me at http://www.sissypantybuns.com/wordpress/?page_id=56 in my Ladies_Full_Briefs-Panties_Modeled-Back_View , at in my panties-modeled-back-view including attachments and comments as well as the VIDEO CLIPS of me male-modeling full brief panties at http://www.sissypantybuns.com/wordpress/?page_id=273 and on my Youtube channel at http://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns/videos , are not subject to copyright and are in the public domain. This constitutes a permanent irrevocable release, authorization, plea and I DOUBLE DARE ALL ADULT WOMEN to COPY, SHARE, AND MAKE PUBLIC the FREE PANTY PHOTOS of me at those web-pages and to attempt to cause the maximum possible relentless saturation media coverage IN MY LADIES FULL BRIEF PANTIES MODELED BACK VIEW and to get my PANTY PHOTOS POSTED AND PUBLISHED in so many places that adult women will see them almost everywhere they look including internet, the ladies rooms in bars, magazines, newspapers, television. I think it will serve me right if I’m made so famous that all women everywhere on earth are talking about me and my panties, laughing at me. and have seen me in my panties often enough to recognize me on the street, yell out their comments and thoughts and ask me embarrassing questions.