Archive for the 'Do you think it's OK for guys to model women's undies (' Category

Lingerie Review Videos: Bali, Vanity Fair, Warners Full Briefs

Saturday, April 5th, 2014

This post contains lingerie reviews of three brands and styles of ladies full brief nylon panties done by me, Mister Sissy Panty Buns, in hopes of becoming the world’s most famous male panty model.

Customer Lingerie Review of Warner’s Modern Brief Panty in Vintage Pink






I love the chiffon floral peplum of the Alison Brittney women’s puff sleeve top I styled with the Warners Vintage Pink nylon full briefs in this OOTD. This blouse also has some frilly feminine ruffles down the front. I love the length of the blouse which hits at my high hip.

TRANSCRIPT: “In this customer lingerie review I’m male-modeling a pair of Warners No Pinching No Problems No Muffin Top full brief panties in the colour ‘Vintage Pink’. In this, uh, lingerie review, I’ve styled this pair of panties with an Alison Brittney floral peplum top. I’ve previously reviewed this brand of panties. Um, they’re very comfortable, and I love this colour. Um, as soon as I saw that colour, ‘Vintage Pink’, I knew I had to have them. Um, I wish I could find some more of them. Uh, they’re a very pretty panty. Um, this customer lingerie review is released into the public domain. Please feel free to share it everywhere.”

Here’s a link to my previous customer lingerie review of these briefs in a different colour on YouTube: MOV-Mister_Panty_Buns-models-and-reviews-Warners-Hibiscus-Petal-Pink-full-briefs-24.AVI).

Lingerie review of Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs Style 2633 by me, Mister Sissy Panty Buns: again, in hopes of becoming the world’s most famous male panty model:

For the most part I like the tailoring of the Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs the rear panel of the panty could stand to be a bit more rounded near the side seams, and to have a more generously cut gusset, especially near the gusset’s rear seam. I am not as big a big fan of vertical back seams as I am gusset seams, even though the vertical back seam may contribute to adding shape to the panty. I prefer the tailoring of the Bali Sleek Comfort Style 2272 which I reviewed in my post titled “A Briefs Update Part 4 - with Customer Lingerie Review Videos” and uploaded a video review of titled: “MOV-male-models-Bali-Sleek_Comfort-full-brief-panties-26.AVI “. The nylon fabric of the Sleek Comfort briefs was not woven as finely as the fabric used in the Skimp Skamp Briefs.






I purchased the pretty Laura Scott Crinkled Peasant Blouse from Sears and chose to style it in this OOTD and lingerie review in order to provide a sharp contrast with the white background of the Bali Skimp Skamp Tender Bud Print Briefs. I purchased three pairs of these briefs - one each from Freshpair, HerRoom and Bealls. The Laura Scott Peasant top was a touch longer than I had hoped, so I has to tuck it up a bit to reveal the panties I was reviewing. If I had let the blouse drape naturally it would have showcased the blouse’s feminine look better and hit at the very low hip.

TRANSCRIPT: “The pair of ladies full brief panties that I’m male-modeling and reviewing in this customer lingerie review video, is Bali Intimates Skimp Skamp full brief panty in Tender Bud Print. Uh, this particular pair of panties is one that I was thinking of wearing to National Underwear Day in Times Square, but chickened out, um, as per usual. Um, this, uh particular brief, the Bali Skimp Skamp Brief was also a former winter, winner in HerRoom’s Undie Awards. Uh, the fit and feel is fabulous, the, the material feels wonderful against my skin, and they’re a pretty feminine panty. Um, I paired it, uh, today, for this blouse and panty outfit, with a Laura Scott, Scott blouse. Um, these panties remind me why I love so much wearing ladies panties. This customer lingerie review is released into the public domain.”

Normally I avoid back seamed panties and would prefer my briefs to have a more generously cut mushroom shaped gusset, but the print won me over because to me it seemed so feminine.

Lingerie Review of Vanity Fair Ravissant Full Brief Nylon Panties in Lilac by me, Mister Sissy Panty Buns, possibly by now the world’s most famous male panty model:

THE WAY THE FABRIC OF A FULL BRIEF PANTY FEELS AGAINST MY SKIN and the way my panties fit are both extremely important to me. I love the feeling of wearing full coverage slippery soft nylon panties that both come up to my natural waist (around my belly button) and also have the elastic of the leg holes sit at the natural fold between my upper thigh and my bottom. The pair of Vanity Fair Ravissant briefs I’m reviewing today are a full coverage panty, have a satin sheen and a very slippery soft feel to them.






Please forgive me for the shakiness of the video in the beginning. My tripod setup was not the best. I didn’t bother describing the blouse I styled in this OOTD because I had worn it with another outfit previously. For more detail on both the green eyelash ruffle blouse and the full coverage briefs, please visit my lingerie fashion and review blog at

TRANSCRIPT: “In this lingerie fashion outfit of the day and review I’m wearing a pair of Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant full brief nylon panties in the colour English Lilac. The fabric of these panties feels heavenly against my skin. It’s very slippery soft and smooth, um, and very comfortable This customer lingerie review video is released into the public domain. Please feel free to share it everywhere and republish it.”

You can see all but one of my customer lingerie review videos on my YouTube channel

All photos and videos of me, Panty Buns, showcasing ladies full brief nylon panties have been released into the public domain. Please share and republish them everywhere.

Male Modeling Hanes Her Way Women’s Nylon Briefs “OOTD” Video Released for Sharing

Sunday, March 10th, 2013

In the following lingerie fashion OOTD photos and video I’m wearing a pair of lavender Hanes Her Way Women’s Nylon Brief Panties from Kmart paired with a Green Eyelash Ruffle Top from Dressbarn.

img. Mister Panty Buns modeling Hanes Her Way Women’s Nylon Brief Panties jpg

Mister Panty Buns modeling Hanes Her Way Women's Nylon Brief Panties

img male modeling Hanes Her Way women’s lavender nylon panties jpg

male modeling Hanes Her Way women's lavender nylon panties


I want the whole world to know how much I love having my Hanes on. I have released all photos and videos of myself wearing, male-modeling or reviewing ladies panties into the public domain. PLEASE SHARE, DISPLAY AND PUBLISH THEM EVERYWHERE!

You can read more about my blouse and panty outfit and comment on my Blogspot plog post titled: “Outfit Post and Review: Hanes Her Way Women’s Nylon Brief Panties“.


Blog MAIN PAGE (post order is mixed up and mostly backwards by post number instead of date)

NSFW Funny Weird free Happy New Year photo eCard

Tuesday, January 1st, 2013

Disclaimer: This post is tongue in cheek. Please read, look, watch and share in the context of its intent to be light-hearted funny weird quirkily sexy? entertainment and comedy - so when you share it an accompanying “LMAO” would be appropriate.

A funny weird Happy New Year Photo eCard titled:

“Happy New Year Sweetie Try Wearing Ladies Panties To Stop Adjusting Yourself in Public”


FunnieOrDieVideo: “Why Women Should Demand That Men Wear Ladies Panties NSFW”

MOV-Why-Women-Should-Demand-That-Men-Wear-Ladies-Panties-NSFW-.AVI - watch more funny videos

Transcript: “Hi. This question is for women trying to have relationships with men who act very macho. Have you ever had problems being embarrassed by your man, scratching himself or adjusting his man parts in public? Do you know why they do that? It’s because their underwear is uncomfortable. Men’s briefs tend to be very scratchy and coarse material and their leg bands are made of an inferior elastic. Also men who wear boxers, their man parts tend to go down one leg. Now if you’ve ever had your man cheat on you and tried to give him a good kick in his man-parts and missed because it was, they weren’t where you thought they’d be? Here’s a solution, I think. Convince him that you would like it if he tried wearing some ladies panties. They’re so much more comfortable, for him, and they’re silky-soft, they hold his man-parts in place, and he won’t have any reason to scratch, or, adjust himself in public. Not only that, but then if he cheats on you, and you go to kick him in his man parts? You won’t miss. This video is released into the public domain.”

For serious recent male-modeled customer lingerie review videos, please visit my YouTube Mister Panty Buns’s Channel. You can also see some older male modeled panty photos on the pages of this blog.


Sunday, October 14th, 2012

Relatively recently, the Undie Award winner for Favorite Brief (Regular Cut) for the THIRD YEAR (winning in 2008, 2011, 2012) was the Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Brief 15712

“This full brief by Vanity Fair is once again your favorite. Made of 100% nylon for a silky soft feel, this panty provides full coverage. It’s offered in many different colors so everyone can have the color they love. The panty has an ultra-soft covered elastic waistband and covered elastic leg openings for a comfortable, custom fit. Comes in sizes 5 to 12 (Small to 5X)”

Previously YouTube user Vanity Fair Lingerie had uploaded a video titled “Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Tailored Brief“, although there was no mention of its having won Undie Awards in 2008, 2011, and 2012 since they apparently uploaded the video prior to winning the award yet again.


Transcript: Transform your intimate apparel wardrobe with the Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Tailored Brief. This beautiful best selling style is a classic, with its double stitched waistband and comfortable no-ride elastic leg openings.Tailored from soft one hundred percent nylon fabric, this panty provides full coverage comfort to make it the perfect complement for any style of clothing. Available in an extended size for curvy figures. Experience Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Tailored Brief.

YouTube user Vanity Fair Lingerie also uploaded a video titled “Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Brief

Transcript: Add a little feminine flair to your intimate apparel wardrobe with the Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Brief. The beautiful lace insets offer a delicate appeal, while the elastic waistband and leg trim give you a flexible and comfortable fit. This silhouette promises full coverage in both the front and back. Satiny nylon fabric keeps you comfortable throughout the day. Discover the elegant sophistication of Vanity Fair’s Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Brief.

As I watched these videos it I couldn’t help but continue to feel miffed that some of the customer lingerie review videos that featured me modeling the identical brand and style of Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Briefs had been marked with a warning: “This video may contain material flagged by YouTube’s user community that may be inappropriate for some users” and requiring people to sign in (and have a Google account?) in order to view them. One poorly lighted video of me modeling and reviewing these same briefs had disappeared and in it’s place was posted a false claim saying “This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy on nudity or sexual content” (slandering me). I consider that it was a clear-cut case of sex discrimination and that the real objection was to my being a MAN SEEN WEARING LADIES PANTIES!

An embed of one of my earlier videos:

The pair of Memoir Rose Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Lace Nouveau Style 13001 ladies full brief nylon panties shown here male modeled, back view, are available both in a wide variety of lingerie and department stores online and in - store. This particular style of Vanity Fair ladies nylon full brief panties are made of a silky-soft finely woven nylon tricot with a cotton lined gusset and triangular lace insets. Vanity Fair advertises these panties as being both comfortable to wear and pretty to look at. I love the colour, look and feel of these panties and wish I could find more of them in a similar vibrant ultra-feminine pink colour. This video is released into the public domain. Please share it.

Mister Panty Buns male models pink satin knickers

As always, I love having the photos and videos of myself male-modeling and reviewing women’s underwear shared and republished as much as possible so please don’t hesitate to do so.

TO SEE THE MOST RECENT POSTS FIRST (correct order) PLEASE CLICK HERE for the RSS FEED as the Blog_Home (MAIN PAGE) post order is mixed up and mostly in reverse order.

Comments have been disabled due to excessive spam, inadequate spam filters and disregard for the COMMENT POLICY


Sunday, February 5th, 2012

In a clear cut case of sex discrimination of my lingerie review videos got totally censored out by YouTube. In trying to justify the censorship they slandered me twice.

Lie number one: First they posted a notice saying the video had been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy against spam, scams, and commercially deceptive content.



YouTube then issued a strike against my YouTube account along with a threat:



When I appealed pointing out that the allegation was bogus, YouTube then posted a different lie.



It occurred to me at this point that the “YouTube Community” may have been infiltrated by members of the AFA, the FRC, or their ilk.

When I Googled “Censorship Advocacy by Hate Groups” the top listing in the Google search was the Wikipedia entry on the American Family Association (AFA). Frank Russo, an on-air spokesman for the AFA of New York unabashedly states that the AFA positions are “Conservative Catholic values” and that homosexuality is sinful.

Although bigoted totalitarian right wing prudes often take extreme positions opposing any kind of nudity or even lingerie ads on the internet, their most aggressive false-flagging campaigns and vitriol are reserved for cross-dressers. Since I male-model ladies panties I find often find myself in their crosshairs. It is much easier for them to argue that men shouldn’t wear women’s clothing (sex discrimination) than it is to argue babies should be blindfolded while breast-feeding and that we should have been born with clothes on. The transphobic vitriol, discriminatory censorship and persecution do not end with the media and the internet, but it is there where the general public is fed a steady diet of lies and, with a few notable exceptions, where the truth gets buried.

Unfortunately as many of us have found out about censorship first hand by having our free speech and expression censored by large corporations who control the internet. Whether it is service providers or the large social networking sites who have attained anti-trust action worthy status, the result is the same. Agitation by a handful of haters and bigots often results in free speech and expression being stifled through straight up censorship. A couple of the large multitude of hater groups agitating for and bullying these corporations into doing the censorship are:

The Family Research Council also known as the FRC and the American Family Association have both been designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a Hate Groups , defined as an organized group or movement that advocates and practices hatred, hostility, or violence towards members of a race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or other designated sector of society. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) hate groups’ “primary purpose is to promote animosity, hostility and malice against persons belonging to a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin which differs from members of the organization”. Other Hate groups listed by the SPLC include 186 separate Ku Klux Klan groups with 52 websites and 196 neo-Nazi groups with 89 websites.

Just who are these people? James Dobson and Tony Perkins are among the many haters at the FRC, while Donald Wildman, Timothy Wildmon, Forrest Daniels, Curtis Petrev, Jack Williams, Burt Harper, Gayle Alexander, Forest Sheffield, Tim Fortner are Directors at the AFA. The AFA has 200 radio stations. Frank Russo and Frank Schroeder appear on many of their cable TV shows. Though they would probably deny being hate-mongers the version of “conservative Catholicism” they espouse paints all trans-people as sinful deviates.

On November 10th, 2011 the American Civil Liberties Union posted some under-reported news: Senate Rejects Resolution That Would Undermine Net Neutrality. Quoting the ACLU article: ” “By rejecting this unwise resolution to overturn net neutrality, the Senate has voted to protect the Internet and preserve its crucial role in advancing the artistic, intellectual, political and economic vitality of our nation,” said Christopher Calabrese, ACLU legislative counsel. “Without net neutrality, Americans’ access to the Internet would hinge not on our right to free speech but on the whims of the corporations that would control it.” “

In recent trans-phobic news, Bridgette Miller of Bust Magazine posted an article titled: “Transgender Woman Makes a Shirtless Statement“. Quoting that Bust Magazine article: “A trip to the DMV can be an exercise in patience for anyone—but for one transgender Tennessee woman, it became a fight for equality. Andrea Jones of Morristown, TN, went in to change her sex from male to female on her driver’s license; when her request was denied, she walked out to the parking lot and took her shirt off. She was arrested for indecent exposure, and argued that if the state recognized her as male, she had the right to be topless in public.” On July 7th of 1992 New York’s highest Court, the Court of Appeals of New York ruled in NY v Santorelli (80 N.Y.2d 875 600 N.E.2d 232) that laws prohibiting exposure of breasts were unconstitutional as they were based on gender and were not substantially related to any important governmental objective. All laws prohibiting the public exposure of female breasts were struck down since they contained “clear gender-based classification, triggering scrutiny under equal protection principles (see Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 97 S. Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397). Since this case is still the precedent, not only are bare breasts legal in the State of New York, but it is illegal to discriminate based on the gender of the person with exposed nipples. It would follow, logically, that it is also illegal to discriminate against a person modeling panties because of their gender.

YouTube and Google argue that if one is singled out for censorship they should not point to others who are NOT censored because that is not relevant to whether or not YouTube’s terms have been violated. That specious argument doesn’t hold water and is a transparent red herring argument for evading any questions about whether or not they practice discrimination in violation of Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 97 S. Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 .


Photos of a man wearing ladies panties are occasionally treated as if they were hard-core pornography, rather than the standard modeling of lingerie that they actually are. By contrast lingerie manufacturers, newspapers, magazines, both broadcast and cable networks , internet companies and movie producers go out of their way to show women in their underwear. Women are seen in panties almost everywhere including on billboard advertising.

As long as it is a woman doing the modeling of women’s underwear, even the most sheer panties will generally not get censored, yet men get censored wearing opaque briefs merely because they are clothing associated with the opposite gender.

The pretty Pin Up Sheer Mesh Knickers carried by Pandora’s choice are see-through lingerie. There is nothing wrong with that whatsoever, nor is there anything wrong with nudity. As the title of a Lady Gaga album showing her bare bottom says, undeniably, we are “Born This Way” (naked).



We should dispense with the specious arguments and enjoy the look of beautiful lingerie.

Bernie Dexter modeling lingerie a YouTube video on BabyGirlBoutique’s Channel.

Pandoras Choice also has a YouTube channel, Pandorasretro, where Pandora’s Choice has uploaded some nice slideshows, like this one, titled: “Lingerie and classic 1950s style womens underwear from pandoraschoice - YouTube







The Style 4234 sheer black mesh nylon Pleated_Panty from Secrets In Lace is quite pretty, has nice feminine lace trimmed leg openings and are very much see-through except for the generous gusset.

The elomi Lara Brief Panty 8065 shown modeled back view at HerRoom is quite sheer except for a panel in the front.

As for the video that YouTube first claimed was spam, at one point lied claiming it was explicit and then lied again claimed it violated their policies, you can see for yourselves that it is NOT spam, NOT explicit, contains NO nudity and NO sexual content. Here is the video on Twitpic (no longer available for viewing on YouTube). There was no excuse for the video being flagged or even less excuse for putting a strike against my account for it.

MOV.Male_Models-Pink_Satin_Panties.AVI  Censored by YouTube t... on Twitpic

I don’t know what else can be done about the gratuitous sex discriminatory censorship other than to oppose further mergers of these way too-powerful internet giants and perhaps join the ACLU in their fight for our freedom of speech and expression. If you feel being supportive like it you always could stop by my YouTube Channel and leave a comment or give my video uploads a Like (Thumb Up).

This male-modeled customer lingerie review video can now be viewed under the Funnie or Die topic Funny Panties, where the embed code is available so you can share it on your blog, webpage etc..

MOV_Male-Models-Pink-Satin-Panties.AVI from Mister_Panty

MOV_Male_Models-Pink-Satin-Panties.AVI - watch more funny videos

You can decline the adobe flask upgrade and then view the video with no problems.
PLEASE SHARE IT everywhere! What good is wearing pretty pink panties if nobody sees them? PLEASE SHARE THIS Video everywhere! Thanks.

To see the most recent posts first please go to the RSS feed as the Blog_Home (MAIN PAGE) post order is mixed up and mostly in reverse order.

Comments have been disabled due to excessive spam and disregard for the COMMENT POLICY

Two YouTube Videos of Man In Panties False-Flagged as “potentially inappropriate content”

Monday, April 11th, 2011

YouTube has severe problems with rampant false flagging of videos and they don’t have enough unprejudiced humans in their employ to review and unflag all the unjustly restricted videos. Innumerable videos are getting false flagged as “inappropriate” based on politics, theology and personal taste by prudes and bigots who have found false flagging to be an effective tool for suppressing expression which doesn’t conform to their own narrow-minded agendas.

Months ago two of my videos were false flagged and YouTube started to require viewers to log in in order to view the videos which were wrongfully put on restricted status.

Two of the auto-generated statements made by YouTube with respect to two of my videos are blatantly false.

Those two false statements are:

1) “This content may contain material flagged by YouTube’s user community that may be inappropriate for some users.”

2) “potentially inappropriate content,”

Contemporaneously, images of me male modeling ladies full brief panties, back view, stopped showing up on image searches.

The two videos are: “PICT_Male-Models-Vanity-Fair-Rose-Pink-Full-Brief-Panties-2.AVI“, which is a video of me doing a customer review of me wearing the same blouse and panties I was wearing in the image shown below (PICT0092.2-Male_Models-Vanity_Fair-rose-pink-full-brief-panties.JPG):


and “PICT_Panty_Buns-Male_Models-Ladies-Pink-Nylon-Panties-7.AVI“, which is a video of me doing a customer review of me wearing the same blouse and panties I was wearing in the following photo (PICT0397_2-Panty_Buns-male_models-pink-nylon-panties.JPG:


Although YouTube’s lawyers may have been trying to cover themselves against libel claims by using the words “may” and “potentially”, the statements are still false and indisputably constitute sex discrimination.

Google’s YouTube may CONSIDER THIS AN APPEAL and request to have an UNPREJUDICED human restore both videos to unrestricted status.

One need only to view the YouTube videos by Victoria’s Secret, the YouTube No Pants Subway Ride 2011 by Improv Everywhere, and the numerous other videos of women in their ladies panties on YouTube to see that placing the two videos of me male modeling pink nylon panties on “Restricted” status is a blatant act of sex discrimination.

The falsely flagged videos in question of me (a man in panties) are embedded below:


Transcript: “The ladies full brief nylon panties that I’m wearing right now are Vanity Fair’s Memoir Rose Style 13001 Lace Nouveau full brief nylon panties. I love these panties and the color especially, which I wish that they still made. Um, as you can see, the gusset has a straight across rear seam, unlike the classic vintage Vanity Fair Style 13001 briefs which were manufactured years ago. These are my favorite panties.”


Transcript: “I guess you can see why so many women call me Panty Buns. Um, I’m male modeling a pair of Vanity Fair full brief nylon panties. They’re Lace Nouveau Style 13001 in Memoir Rose. I love being seen male-modeling ladies panties as a world famous male panty model. So you can just share it with every adult woman you know, um, and let me know what you think. You can let me know what you think at

What is really peculiar is the difference between Google’s publicly stated goals of freedom of expression and in opposition to censorship and their current flagging system on YouTube and Google Image Search.

The United Nations has on it’s website “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, which the U.N. adopted on December 10, 1948. Google has pointed out that recent censorship attempts sought to violate Article 19 of that document and quotes it as saying: “Everyone has a right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

Despite having decried this kind of censorship, Google’s YouTube Community aids and abets censorship when it comes to the false flagging of YouTube videos. Google’s flagging system allows a minority of extremist prudes to effectively censor whatever they don’t like. Those who have their photos and videos false-flagged have no adequate recourse. Ergo, Google’s own policy enabling the false-flagging of videos as “potentially inappropriate” violates the very rights they claimed to support when they cited Article 19 of the United Nations “Declaration of Human Rights”.

As of this date YouTube continues to have an unmanageable problem with political operatives and bigots false-flagging every video they don’t like and not enough unprejudiced reviewers to correct all the false flagging. When free expression and due process are increasingly subordinated to systematic attacks by a group of ideologues and there is inadequate capacity (not enough unprejudiced human reviewers) for appeals and redress, then perhaps Google and YouTube should consider eliminating the entire system of flagging. It appears the system only works for those who like to false-flag.

the content on this site constitutes free speech and expression protected under the Ninth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments to the of the United States. This site is not commercial, is not a business, does not sell any service or product or anything at all, does not receive or solicit any compensation.

ALL PHOTOS AND VIDEOS OF ME MALE MODELING LADIES FULL BRIEF PANTIES ARE FREE AND ARE RELEASED INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN for any and all purposes with the sole exception that any attempts to restrict the rights of others to publish and share them shall be null and void.

Net neutrality demands that dominant internet presence may not be used to stifle or censor unpopular views, images and videos. These photos and videos are to remain forever in the public domain. For YouTube to require the public to acquire a YouTube channel and log into it in order to view any of my videos violates net neutrality and infringes on the rights of the public to peruse that which is in the public domain. Additionally to the false-flagged status is an example of market dominance being abused to restrict access to public domain material in furtherance of sex discrimination. Part of the purpose of the First Amendment is to protect unpopular expression and insure that it can be seen and heard. It would be nice to think that large corporate media owners might reconsider their opposition to having a free press.

Tags: #false flagging, #full briefs, #man in panties, #sex discrimination, #weird news, #funny, #viral video, #share this #violations of net neutrality

Please see the COMMENT POLICY before commenting.

Blog_Home (MAIN PAGE)

Please Read The Comment Policy

Friday, October 15th, 2010

Please read the Comment Policy before commenting. Thank you.

Post Script: That worked - NOT! Comments have been disabled due to excessive spam.

Blog_Home (MAIN PAGE)

Administrator’s note: Comments are being disabled due to insufficient spam filters. Even the comment policy was getting spammed.


Sunday, September 26th, 2010

So What’s the story with why the episode of Sesame Street with Katy Perry was cancelled? Reportedly it was because of negative feedback they received, but the negative feedback wasn’t disclosed leaving us to speculate:

Oh, no! It’s an attractive woman with breasts singing and dancing! Eek!

There seems to be no limit to what these prudes will try to censor, whether it’s me or Katy Perry. What if someone’s ankle shows (gasp!). Apparently someone thought there was too much cleavage (under the fine mesh of her outfit) or that she seemed too sexy. Why do PBS, Google, Apple, Youtube, Facebook and Flickr knuckle under to the hypocritical manufactured pressure from fundamentalists, ideologues, theocrats and their techno-spammed hate campaigns?

Was the negative feedback related to previous big hit by Katy Perry - I Kissed a Girl?

One wonders whether they might have had horrible headaches at Sesame Street trying to decide whether they should have hired a transvestite to avoid having cleavage or conversely since Katy Perry was asking Elmo whether he wanted to play “Dress Up” may have worried that people who have Transphobia might be perturbed. Many bigots harbour intense hatred and loathing for trans-gendered, transsexuals, transvestites, cross-dressers etc..

Speaking of hypocrisy, Someone at the Mercury News pointed out that Elmo wasn’t wearing any pants!

Maybe the top executives were afraid someone would catch them ogling Katy Perry’s breasts. Are they going to refrain from coverage of candidate O’Donnell due to her having cleavage? After all, theocratic Senatorial candidate Christine O’Donnell does show more cleavage than Katy Perry did in the Sesame Street video that got pulled.

Look out Miss Piggy, Katie might want to play with Kermit! What’s the deal here? The song and the skit are adorable. Who will be censored next? Snow White? Alice in Wonderland?

Katy Perry sings “Hot N Cold” with Elmo on Sesame Street!”

It was excellent timing that Katy Perry appeared on Saturday Night Live soon after the censorship had reared it’s ugly head at PBS. Katy performed “Teenage Dream” on Saturday Night Live Sept. 25, 2010. Katy and her back-up singers wore outfits that looked a bit like school uniforms. The hemlines of the tiered red skirts were high enough to reveal the black panties underneath to be frequently visible during the performance.
Not only are panty-revealing outfits very much in vogue, but the song but the lyrics fro the refrain of chorus “Don’t ever look back, Don’t ever look back” gave me a feel-good feeling as well.

Thankfully for the most part the fashionista, GLBT and feminist communities have rejected censorship. That doesn’t mean there aren’t right wing-nuts posing as feminists who want to censor everything. For them I would suggest that they think about the hard struggle for equal rights and privileges for women and how censoring people based on gender is not feminist at all.

Maybe it’s the fact that i have found myself on the receiving end of censorship that i am so sensitive to it.

You Tube has aided and abetted the “YouTube’s user community” in the perpetration of sex discrimination and the committing of defamation by allowing the video titled: PICT_Male-Models-Vanity-Fair-Rose-Pink-Full-Brief-Panties-2.AVI: video to be FALSE-FLAGGED and failing to un-flag it after this wrongful flagging was brought to their attention.

The continuing libel accompanying the demand for people to have an account and sign in to see this video appears when someone clicks on the video and states:

“This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube’s user community.”

Here is the TRANSCRIPT from the flagged video is titled: PICT_Male-Models-Vanity-Fair-Rose-Pink-Full-Brief-Panties-2.AVI:

“The ladies full brief nylon panties that I’m wearing right now are Vanity Fair’s Memoir Rose Style 13001 Lace Nouveau full brief nylon panties. I love these panties and the color especially, which I wish that they still made. Um, as you can see, the gusset has a straight across rear seam, unlike the classic vintage Vanity Fair Style 13001 briefs which were manufactured years ago. These are my favorite panties.”

YouTube and Google are noticed and are fully aware that this video was flagged SOLEY because of my gender. If I had been female this video would not be flagged.

Failure to un-flag this video would be affirmatively negligent and evidence of intent to knowingly continue the defamation motivated by sex discrimination - a hate crime.

If YouTube were to try tto defend this false flagging it would fly in the face of President and CEO Eric Schmidt’s recent claims at his interview with the Wall Street Journal that he opposes censorship and would by implication make him out to be a liar.

It would also bolster the credibility of the French Court in Paris that recently convicted Google and it’s chief executive, Eric Schmidt, of defamation.

Perhaps the entire construct of how access and control of the internet is being co-opted and controlled, by whom, and the premises of the basic setups should be re-examined. I believe the internet should be for adults,that unfiltered searching should be the default setting, and that if people want to control what they or their children can view then they should be the ones bearing the burden of installing filtering programs like Cyber-Nanny or programs that censor stuff for THEIR OWN viewing only, not for everyone else’s. I myself have no interest whatsoever in viewing or being viewed by people who are not adults and greatly resent it whenever I feel that my viewing or being viewed is being limited by narrow minded selfish bigots who place their agenda or avaricious desires above the Constitution of the United States and its Amendments, the Bill of Rights.

Let the un-american prudes who advocate censorship be the ones who have to accept cookies, as in WARNING: PRUDE. Let the advocates of freedom have the more secure cookie free safe from virus setups. Let the right wing-nuts, theocrats and prudes be relegated to the limited niche of hackery, censorship, deceit, lies, history re-writing and prejudice that is their comfort zone - all in their own little bubble.

There is no reason the rest of the world should have to abide by their prejudices.

Here is the video titled “PICT_Male-Models-Vanity-Fair-Rose-Pink-Full-Brief-Panties-2.AVI” that YouTube requires people to sign in to see, stating:

“This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube’s user community.”

Blog_Home (MAIN PAGE)

Comment Policy

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Since so few people are taking note of the Comment Policy I am presenting it again as a main page post.

Simply comment on the topic of the post and don’t include links to illegal stuff. How hard is that?

Comments on this website are moderated. If you have made a legitimate comment and it has not yet been posted, THANK YOU for your comment! Please be patient as it sometimes takes me a while to get to them. Please do not SPAM. Unfortunately I often have to delete more than 150 spam comments per day. I love getting genuine non-spam comments, even nasty ones. To increase your chances of getting your comment posted please note:

Legitimate comments get great latitude since censorship is deplored here. Offensive and derogatory comments do get published including colorful language.

Promotion of illegal stuff is not allowed unless, in the sole discretion of the administrator it is Constitutionally protected free expression and the laws are unconstitutional.

The same goes for links. Please do not submit URLs for illegal activity.

SPAM gets deleted. If your comment does not have some relation to the post under which it was submitted it will be deleted. Some self-promotion is okay, but comments with little or no content and tons of links and html are more likely to be deleted.

Generic comments are spam. Generic comments and comments unrelated to the posts will be deleted and/or marked as spam.

I reserve the right, as administrator, to edit SPAM and fuck around with it or add editorial comments to any pro-censorship political hackery. With that said,

This is a free speech site and chances are your non-spam comments will be published. Good commenters are more likely to get links. Thank you for your patience.


DISCLAIMER - for Adult Women Only - (no minors or males, please)

Saturday, May 16th, 2009

By entering this site and or viewing and or downloading this material you agree to bear full responsibility for determining if this material is in conformity with applicable laws for your locale. You agree to hold the persons and or things involved in creating or hosting this site harmless against any and all claims or actions resulting from your viewing, visiting, use or downloading anything from or on this site, indemnify them against any liability resulting therefrom, and will not distribute it to minors. You recognize that the content on this site constitutes free speech and expression protected under the Ninth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. This site is not commercial, is not a business, does not sell any service or product or anything at all, does not receive or solicit any compensation. All PHOTOS OF ME IN MY LADIES PANTIES (male modeled, back view) and any related text are FREE and have been released into the public domain. Please copy, share, re-post, and re-publish them for adult women everywhere. The rights to some Halloweens-in-full-drag-photos and some non-panty related text are reserved but may be used under the creative commons thing-a-ma-bob (fair use). Permissions with respect to any products such as MAKEUP or BOOKS etc. reside with their respective authors. All endorsements, recommendations and links are supplied for informational, educational, editorial, free expression and or entertainment purposes. Please share this site’s URL, feel free to make non-spam comments, and see if you can figure out how to make me world famous in my nylon women’s undies-modeled-back_view! Have you heard the expression be careful what you ask for? Well I’m begging for it and taunting you. I beg and dare you to make me world famous in my ladies panties complete with relentless saturation media coverage. Do you think you are smart enough to make it happen? Are you too chicken to do it? I’m double daring you!
I encourage all women to check out the photos of me, Panty Buns, male-modeling women’s underwear (full-briefs back-view) and to leave comments, questions and suggestions.

Please see the COMMENT POLICY before commenting.



Do you think it’s OK for guys to model ladies panties (back-view)?

Friday, May 15th, 2009

How much gender-bias do you think there is with respect to attitudes about a male-modeling ladies panties in comparison to when women model underwear? Had you ever heard of or known about a man wearing ladies panties before?

Photo of man modeling Dixie Belle lace trimmed full brief nylon panties, back view

Please see the COMMENT POLICY before commenting.


What do you think of a guy modeling panties back view?

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Have you seen men wearing panties before? What were your thoughts? Please check out some of the photos of me, Panty Buns, modeling women’s underwear (full-briefs back-view) which are all released into the public domain. What do you think of me male-modeling ladies panties? If you’ve checked the “panty photos” out, I’d love to read your thoughts, comments, suggestions and questions (adult women only, please).

Photo of me male modeling Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau style 13001 Azure Mist nylon full brief panties, back view:


Please see the COMMENT POLICY before commenting.


What do you look for in a panty?

Friday, May 15th, 2009

What qualities do you look for in full brief women’s underwear? The comfort of the particular full-brief ladies nylon panties? The fit of full-brief women’s-nylon-underpants? The sexiness of a sheer-nylon-panty? if there is lace trim in or on the ladies-briefs, whether it is inset or not? The stitching of the seams of the women’s briefs? The pattern and cut and size of the gusset of the women’s-undies? The feel of the nylon or silk fabric of the ladies-panty? Out of the following brands, which do you prefer? Dixie_Belle, Maidenform, Vanity Fair, Nancy King, WinterSilks, LandsEnd, other? Would you consider making comments about the qualities you see or like about each of these pairs brands and styles pictured in the free photos of various pairs of ladies panties male modeled, back view on this site at or being male-modeled in the videos uploaded to YouTube on Mister Panty Bun’s Channel?

Male Models Vanity Fair Rose Pink Full Brief Panties - YouTube



Friday, May 15th, 2009

Panty-Photos Panties-Modeled-Back-View
due to the constant requests I decided to post thumbnail sized panty-photos here in the panties-modeled-back_view category instead of just on the page at http://www.sissypantybuns,com/wordpress/?page_id=56 starting with just a couple and adding the rest in later. Since the posts seem to be a little independent of each other I’m sorry for having to bore you with the disclaimer again: DISCLAIMER - intended for Adult Women - (no minors or males, please) By entering this site and or viewing and or downloading this material you verify that you are over the age of 18 and bear full responsibility for determining if this material is in conformity with applicable laws for your locale. You agree to hold the persons and or things involved in creating or hosting this site harmless against any and all claims or actions resulting from your viewing, visiting, use or downloading anything from or on this site, indemnify them against any liability resulting therefrom. You recognize that the content on this site constitutes free speech and expression protected under the Ninth, Fourteenth, and First Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. This site is not commercial, is not a business, does not sell any service or product or anything at all, does not receive or solicit any compensation. Any PHOTOS OF PANTIES-MODELED and accompanying text ARE FREE and have all been RELEASED into the public domain intended for viewing by mature ADULT WOMEN (all others please view somewhere else). All endorsements, recommendations and links are supplied for informational, educational, editorial, free expression and or entertainment purposes without compensation or any desire for it. Feel free to comment and share this site URL, your comments and see if you can figure out how to make me world famous in my nylon women’s undies-modeled-back_view! Have you heard the expression be careful what you ask for? Well I’m begging for it and taunting you: I dare you help make me world famous in my panties complete with relentless saturation media coverage. Maybe you’re not smart enough or too chicken to do it? Double dare! Here are some thumbnail size panty-photos. Some can be clicked on to enlarge. I, Panty Buns, am pleading to adult women: I beg you and dare you to share these with other consenting adult women everywhere.

The first group of panty-photos of me, “Panty Buns”, is in a Style&Co aqua floral-print short-flutter-sleeve ruffled-crepe tiered-blouse and a pair of Memoir_Rose-pink-style_13001 Vanity_Fair Lace_Nouveau lace_inset nylon-full-brief-ladies-panties-modeled-back_view.For more detailed information about this particular pair of Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau Full Briefs you can CLICK HERE to watch a short video clip of me male-modeling these rose pink nylon panties (back view).


Panty-photos of Panty Buns wearing an a.n.a. Peplum Electric Pink tie-front crepe-puff_sleeve blouse with Azure_Mist-style_13001 Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau lace inset full-brief-ladies-nylon-panties-modeled-back_view
pink_floral-crepe-puff_sleeve-blouse-Azure_Mist-style_13001-Vanity_Fair-lace_inset-pantypanty-photo-Azure_Mist-Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau lace inset full-brief-ladies-nylon-panties-modeled-back_view  panty-photo-Panty-Buns-Azure-Vanity-Fair-nylon-lace-inset-full-briefs-modeled-back-viewpanty_photo-Panty_Buns-puff_sleeve_top-Azure_Mist-Lace_Nouveau-ladies-panties-modeledpanty-photo-Azure_Mist-Vanity_Fair-style_13001-full-brief-ladies-nylon-panties-modeled  panty-photo-Azure_Mist-Vanity_Fair-lace-inset-full-brief-women's-nylon-panty-modeledpanty-photo-pink_floral_top-Vanity_Fair_style_13001-full-brief-ladies-nylon-undies-modeledpanty-photo-aqua-Vanity_Fair-Lace_Nouveau-women's-full_brief-nylon-panties-modeledpanty-photo-Azure_Mist-Vanity_Fair-nylon-full-brief-ladies-panties-male_modeled

free-panty-photos Panty-Buns in a Spencer_Jeremy-yellow-floral-pleated-neck-flutter-sleeve-crepe-blouse and Vanity_Fair-Perfectly_Yours-Lace_Nouveau black-nylon-full_brief-ladies-panties-modeled-back_view
yellow-floral-short-sleeve-crepe-top-Vanity_Fair-Lace_Nouveau black-nylon-ladies- pantiespanty-photo-Panty-Buns-black-Vanity_Fair-lace-inset-full_brief-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty_Buns-male_modeling-Vanity_Fair-Lace_Nouveau-black_nylon_pantiespanty-photo-Panty-Buns-Vanity_Fair-style_13001-black-nylon-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-black-nylon-Lace_Nouveau-full_brief-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-full_brief-lace_inset-black-Vanity_Fair-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-black-nylon-lace_inset-full_brief-ladies-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-black-Vanity_Fair-lace_inset-ladies-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-Lace_Nouveau-black-nylon-full_brief-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-Lace_Nouveau-full_brief-ladies-black-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-lace_inset-ladies-full_brief-black-nylon-panties-modeled-back-viewpanty-photo-Panty-Buns-VF-style-13001-full_brief-black-nylon-panties-modeled-back-view


Panty-Photos Panties-Modeled-Back-View
pink-frilly-cap-sleeve-ruffled-nylon-babydoll-Azure_Mist-Vanity_Fair-Lace-Nouveau-full-brief-womens-nylon-underwearpanty-photo-pink_ruffled_babydoll-aqua-Vanity_Fair-lace-inset-panties-(back_view)Panty-Photo Pink-Frilly-Cap-Sleeve-Ruffled-Nylon-Babydoll-Azure_Mist-Vanity_Fair-Lace-Nouveau-Full-Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-Back-View











Panty-Photo-Kimono_Red-Flexees_Shapewear-Camisole-Maidenform-Sea_Foam_Green-Lace_Waist-Full-Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-With-TagsPanty-Photo-Panty-Buns-in-Flexees-Microfiber-and-Lace-Camisole-Maidenform_Wise_Buys-Full_Brief-Ladies_Nylon_Panties-Modeled-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Kimono_Red-Flexees_Camisole-Maidenform-Lace-Waist-Nylon-Full_Brief-Panties-Modeled-by Panty-Buns-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Style_3366_KMR-Flexees-Camisole-Style_98_PB-Maidenform-Nylon-Panties-Male_Modeled-by-Panty-Buns-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Panty-Buns-Male_Modeling-Flexees-Microfiber_And_Lace-Camisole-Maidenform-Nylon-Full_Brief-Panties-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Flexees-Shapewear-Camisole-Maidenform-Lace_Waist-Full_Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-by-Panty-Buns-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Panty-Buns-in-Flexees-Everyday_Control-Camisole-Sea_Foam_Green-Maidenform-Wise_Buys-Lace_Waist-Full_Brief-Women's-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Flexees-Microfiber-and-Lace-Camisole-Sea_Foam_Green-MaidenForm-Lace_Waist-Full_Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-by-Panty-Buns-Back-View




Panty-Photo-Pink-Nylon-Cap-Sleeve-Ruffled-Babydoll-Lace-Inset-Full_Brief-Deep-Pink-Ladies-Nylon-PantiesPanty-Photo-Panty Buns-wearing-Frilly-Ruffled-Cap_Sleeve-Nightie-Memoir_Rose-Vanity_Fair-Lace-Nouveau-Full_Brief-Nylon-Women's-Undies-Backside-ModeledFree-Panty-Photo-Panty-Buns-in-Ruffled-Cap_Sleeve-Babydoll-Vanity_Fair-Lace-Nouveau-Deep-Rose-Pink-Full-Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Panty-Buns-Wearing-Pastel-Pink-Cap_Sleeve-Ruffled-Nylon-Babydoll-Vanity_Fair-Hot-Rose-Pink-Full_Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-Back-ViewPanty-Photo-Frilly-Pastel-Pink-Nylon-Nightie-Vanity_Fair-Style_13001-Rose-Pink-Nylon-Full-Brief-Ladies-Panties-Modeled-by-Panty-Buns-Back-ViewFree-Panty-Photo-Panty-Buns-in-Cap_Sleeve-Ruffled-Nylon-Babydoll-Vanity_Fair-Lace-Inset-Full-Brief-Deep-Rose-Pink-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-Back-View


Free-Panty-Photo-Pastel-Pink-Ruffled-Babydoll-Touch_Me_Natural_Massaging-Wooden-Bath-Brush-Vanity_Fair-Memoir_Rose-Deep_Pink-Ladies-Nylon-Full_Brief-Undies-Modeled-by-Panty-Buns-Back-ViewFree_Panty_Photo-Pink_Nylon-Cap_Sleeve-Ruffled-Babydoll-Wooden-Bath-Brush-Memoir_Rose-Vanity_Fair-Deep_Pink-Nylon-Full_Brief-Ladies_Panties-Male_Modeled-by-Panty_Buns-Back_ViewFree-Panty-Photo-Panty-Buns-in-Ruffled-Cap_Sleeve-Pink-Nylon-Babydoll-With-Yellow-Plastic-Bathbrush-Wearing-Style_13001-Deep_Pink-Full_Brief-Women's-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-Back-ViewFree-Panty-Photo-Pastel-Pink-Nylon-Ruffled-Cap_Sleeve-Babydoll-Yellow-Plastic-Bath_Brush-Vanity_Fair-Lace_Nouveau-Full_Brief-Ladies-Rose-Pink-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-By-Panty-Buns-Back-ViewFree-Panty-Photo-Nylon-Ruffled-Cap_Sleeve-Babydoll-Blue-Plastic-Bathbrush-Vanity_Fair-Style_13001-Lace_Nouveau-Memoir-Rose-Full_Brief-Ladies-Nylon-Panties-Modeled-by-Panty-Buns-Back-ViewVanity Fair Lace Nouveau Rose Pink Full Brief Nylon Panties Male Modeled Back View

All the photos are free of any copyright restrictions and are authorized to be published copied and shared. MODEL RELEASE AND DARE:
     I, Panty Buns, also known as Mister Panty, hereby irrevocably RELEASE ALL THE PANTY PHOTOS of myself in my full brief ladies panties modeled back view to be copied, shared, re-published and viewed by and for all adult women on the planet. I further declare and confirm that all of these free panty photos and videos of myself posted at or as attachments to the web-pages having PANTY PHOTOS of me at in my Ladies_Full_Briefs-Panties_Modeled-Back_View , at in my panties-modeled-back-view including attachments and comments as well as the VIDEO CLIPS of me male-modeling full brief panties at and on my Youtube channel at , are not subject to copyright and are in the public domain. This constitutes a permanent irrevocable release, authorization, plea and I DOUBLE DARE ALL ADULT WOMEN to COPY, SHARE, AND MAKE PUBLIC the FREE PANTY PHOTOS of me at those web-pages and to attempt to cause the maximum possible relentless saturation media coverage IN MY LADIES FULL BRIEF PANTIES MODELED BACK VIEW and to get my PANTY PHOTOS POSTED AND PUBLISHED in so many places that adult women will see them almost everywhere they look including internet, the ladies rooms in bars, magazines, newspapers, television. I think it will serve me right if I’m made so famous that all women everywhere on earth are talking about me and my panties, laughing at me. and have seen me in my panties often enough to recognize me on the street, yell out their comments and thoughts and ask me embarrassing questions.

More Free-Panty-Photos-Ladies-Full-Briefs-Male-Modeled-Back-View

TO SEE THE MOST RECENT POSTS FIRST (correct order) PLEASE CLICK HERE for the RSS FEED as the Blog_Home (MAIN PAGE) post order is mixed up and mostly in reverse order.

Comments have been disabled due to excessive spam, inadequate spam filters and disregard for the COMMENT POLICY

Free Panty Photo: Panty Buns Holding Out a Blue Plastic Bathbrush in his Frilly Pastel Pink Nylon Cap Sleeve Ruffled Babydoll and Memoir Rose Vanity Fair Lace Nouveau Lace Inset Full Brief Deep Pink Ladies Nylon Panties (Back View)

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Please copy, share and publish this free panty photo of me male-modeling Vanity Fair Memoir Rose pink nylon full brief panties. It is released into the public domain.


There are comments on this photo of me in my pink nylon panties at and a short video of me male-modeling this babydoll and pair of nylon full briefs (click here to view on YouTube). There are more uploaded videos of me male-modeling and reviewing full brief panties on my YouTube Channel.

More Free-Panty-Photos-Ladies-Full-Briefs-Male-Modeled-Back-View

Please see the COMMENT POLICY before commenting.